Emily Mendenhallab & Shane A. Norrisb
a Science, Technology, and Int ernat ional Af fairs Program, Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georget own Universit y, Washingt on, DC, USA
b MRC/ Wit s Development al Pat hways for Healt h Research Unit , Universit y of t he Witwat ersand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Global Public Health: An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice Published online: 02 Feb 2015.
Flory was a 59-year-old low-income woman residing in Soweto, a township in Johannesburg, South Africa. Throughout her life, community played a central role: from contributing to the resistance to apartheid, a cause that made her a widow, to managing a small business in Soweto and eventually serving as a community police force officer. She resigned as an officer in 2009 once her vision became blurry.Within months, her father died unexpectedly and her brother died of complications of both AIDS and Type 2 diabetes. Flory fell into a deep depression following this loss and ‘nearly died’. She lost weight and her diabetes was out of control. Together with the support of her doctors and sisters, who said, ‘if you continue like this, you’ll die’, Flory came out of her depression and busied herself caring for her grandchildren and ironing and washing for people to earn money on the side. Today, caring for her daughter’s bipolar disorder continues to cause her stress because her daughter ‘loses it and snaps at us’ and serves as breadwinner for eleven dependents. Yet, Flory remains resilient – seeking medical care every three months for her now-controlled diabetes and improved mental health.
Woven into a complicated social history and complex epidemiological landscape, Flory’s narrative summary introduces how social and health problems come together in people’s lives. In Soweto, the psychological imprints of political violence of the Apartheid era and structural violence of HIV/AIDS have shaped social and health discourses. Yet, as non-communicable diseases (NCDs) increasingly become part of social and biomedical discussions in South African townships, new frames for describing what is sickness are emerging. Such frames incorporate the concept of syndemics, a portmanteau term that combines ‘synergy’ and ‘epidemic’ to conceptualise how social inequality fuels the mutual exacerbation of concurrent epidemics (Singer, 2009). Although syndemic clustering of communicable diseases, such as HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis (cf. Daftary, 2012), and NCDs, such as Type 2 diabetes (hereafter, ‘diabetes’) and depression (cf. Phaswana- Mafuya et al., 2013), has been documented in urban ghettos like Soweto, studies have yet to consider how the interaction of NCDs with infectious ones shape people’s lives.
The integration of epidemiological- and experiential-level analysis of multiple, overlapping social and health problems has been referred to elsewhere as ‘syndemic suffering’ (Mendenhall, 2012). The complexities of syndemic suffering in South Africa occur primarily among low-income groups who demonstrate marked increases in NCDs and experience the highest burden of infectious ones (Mayosi et al., 2009). For example, in Soweto, diabetes prevalence reaches 14% (Crowther & Norris, 2012) while HIV/AIDS continues to affect one in four (Karim, Churchyard, Karim, & Lawn, 2009). While the social epidemiology of these co-occurring diseases point to the complexities of how people may experience sickness within their social landscape, little is known about how people conceptualise such syndemic suffering in everyday life.
The complex suffering in Soweto has emerged by way of a historical legacy of structural and political violence as well as rapid globalisation, transforming how people eat, move and interact (Coovadia, Jewkes, Barron, Sanders, & McIntyre, 2009). Economic development, changing lifestyles, rural-to-urban migration, new possibilities for wealth and social mobility and persistent inequality have cultivated a Soweto that is both the home of a burgeoning middle class and persistent underclass. These exposures shape how many Black South Africans residing in Soweto eat and move, exemplified by the influx of inexpensive energy dense processed foods and high-density living; these changes are reflective in increasing numbers of NCDs like diabetes (Mayosi et al., 2012). They also produce context for complex medical problems among vulnerable populations. For example, a long-standing urban South African cohort study indicates that those most affected by an escalation of non-communicable hypertension and heart disease are older Black women originating from Soweto (Stewart, Carrington, Pretorius, Methusi, & Silwa, 2011). What is concerning is that the disproportionate social and biological impact of HIV/AIDS within the Soweto context further complicates women’s health as HIVis a risk factor for heart disease (Schwartz, Magdi, Steen, & Sjaastad, 2012). This interplay underscores syndemic suffering where social and economic circumstances exacerbate the interaction between NCDs and infectious ones.
This study concerns syndemic diabetes and depression, which is a dynamic comorbidity that epidemiologically clusters among the poor in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs; Leone, Coast, Narayanan, & de Graft Aikins, 2012). Indeed, in such contexts depression may be higher among people with diabetes when compared to those with diabetes in wealthy countries (Mendenhall, Norris, Shidhaye, & Prabhakaran, 2014). The substantial body of research on depression and diabetes in high-income countries demonstrates a bidirectional relationship, where depression contributes to diabetes, and vice versa (cf. Holt, de Groot, & Golden, 2014). The convergence of diabetes and depression in LMICs is particularly concerning because poverty and depression are closely correlated and may worsen and complicate physical health problems (Lund et al., 2010). In addition to the social problems women face in Soweto, nearly one-third present with psychological distress and this increases exponentially among those with two or more physical disorders, including diabetes (Mendenhall, Richter, Stein, & Norris, 2013).
The ubiquity of suffering infused through the Soweto landscape illuminates dynamic social, economic and epidemiological transitions. Novel semantics of suffering emerge to make sense of contemporary lifestyles that describe how people experience and understand suffering of everyday realities. In Idioms of Distress Revisited, Mark Nichter (2010) states that we:
Theoretically grounded in scholarship around cross-cultural constructions of illness and suffering (Garro, 2000; Good, 1977; Kleinman, 1980; Mattingly & Garro, 2000; Nichter, 1981, 2010), this notion of hybridity reveals that as culture changes so do the semantics of suffering change. For example, Mexican immigrants living in the USA use diabetes as an idiom of distress to communicate disorder from their social worlds, thereby connecting somatic symptoms with social and psychological suffering that emerges apart from and interconnected to biomedical realities (Mendenhall, Seligman, Fernandez, & Jacobs, 2010). Indeed, as women discover and renegotiate syndemic suffering in Soweto, the ways in which people interact with and interpret illness and suffering reveal important local sources of suffering, coping and surviving. This article critically examines how women in Soweto blur the boundaries between biomedical diseases to portray a nuanced construct of syndemic suffering that embodies a social and epidemiologic context in flux.
The 27 women in this study were recruited from the Birth to Twenty (Bt20) cohort study, which is situated at Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital (‘Bara’) located in Soweto – a township of Johannesburg, South Africa. This history and composition of Bt20 is explained in-depth elsewhere (Richter, Norris, Pettifor, Yach, & Cameron, 2007). Notably, in this paper we use the term ‘Black’ to describe the women interviewed for this study; we do so knowing that ‘Black’ is a political category instated during apartheid and that important cultural nuances linked with ethnicity exist in South Africa (Ellison, de Wet, Ijselmuiden, & Richter, 1997). The Black women who participated in this study represent various regions of South Africa and are unified by their resettlement in Soweto, long-term residence there, and enrolment in the Bt20 cohort study.
Of more than 1000 women interviewed in a data collection wave in 2010 for Bt20, 73 women self-reported previous diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes and self-identified as ‘Black’. These 73 women were contacted to participate in this study by phone. The women who did not participate in the study were unavailable during the interview period, unreachable by phone, unable to travel or deceased. We excluded active substance abusers and individuals who had severely disabling diabetes complications, cognitive impairment or psychosis severe enough to interfere with participation in the interview.
Twenty-seven interviews were conducted at Bara between November and December of 2012. Nineteen interviews were conducted in English by the first author and eight were conducted in either Zulu or Sesotho by a multilingual research assistant (RA). The first author observed every non-English interview to ensure consistency across the interviews and discussed each of these interviews in-depth with the RA. The RA was the first contact for each study participant by inviting them to participate and scheduling an interview time. After providing informed consent, women participated in a 60–90 minute in-depth qualitative interview followed by the administration of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), a self-report survey of previously diagnosed disorders and a brief sociodemographic questionnaire. All interviews were audio-recorded and women were compensated 50 ZAR (around 5.88 USD) for transportation costs. All data collection received clearance by the University of the Witwatersrand Human Ethics Committee (Clearance number M121059).
The qualitative data presented in this article come from a larger interview around stress, social relationships, cultural beliefs and experiences with diabetes, perceptions about the relationship of diabetes and HIV and health care experiences. Each narrative interview began with: ‘Can you describe a typical day?’ The interview then shifted to address women’s understanding of and experiences with stress, including questions like ‘What does stress mean to you?’, ‘How do you define stress?’ and ‘What aspects of your life cause you the most stress?’. We also asked targeted questions about family and community relationships and support systems. We spent the last half of the interview discussing diabetes, including questions like ‘Has diabetes changed your life in any way?’ and ‘Does stress affect your diabetes in any way?’ Also, we inquired around their perceptions of relationships among multiple morbidities. We concluded the interview with questions around health care experiences.
Depression was measured by administering the CES-D, a widely used 20-item questionnaire designed to assess the major symptoms of depression in English (Radloff, 1977). A reliable and well-validated instrument, the CES-D’s targeted symptoms include depressed mood, changes in appetite and sleep, low energy, feelings of hopelessness, low self-esteem and loneliness. Respondents were asked to consider the presence and duration of each item/symptom over the past week and to rate each along a 4-point scale from 0 (rarely or never) to 3 (most or all of the time). Possible scores range from 0 to 60. We present data for ‘likely depression’ (CESD 16) to be an acceptable predictive validity as a screen for depression in a community population (Radloff, 1977).
We then asked the study participants if they had been previously diagnosed with the following disorders: obesity, hypertension, anxiety, depression, HIV, tuberculosis and arthritis. We concluded the interview with a brief demographic questionnaire to measure age, education, income, duration of diabetes, if she had ever visited a counsellor, health insurance and where she received health care.
The qualitative interviews were transcribed and those conducted in Sesotho and Zulu were translated into English. We examined emergent themes around stress and diabetes, which led us to three thematic sections. The first is how women conceived and communicated stress in their everyday lives, which resulted from questions such as ‘How do you define stress?’ and ‘What does stress feel like?’ The second theme was common social stressors women expressed from their daily lives, including both social and disease-related stresses. The final theme emerged around perceptions of a relationship between diabetes and other diseases, including HIV. The first author coded each of these themes and discussed the findings with the second author. Patterns in these data are reported in Table 2 and exemplar quotations of each category were excerpted.
We present measures of depression as descriptive data in conjunction with demographic information (Table 1) and co-occurring with social stressors (Table 2). These data are presented only to provide insight into the concordance between social stress and depression among those with diabetes, as opposed to correlation or causation.
Table 1 describes the women in the sample as on average 59 (43–79) years of age, having lived with diabetes for (on average) 10 years, nearly two-thirds having less than 12 years of school, and around half relying on a monthly government pension or less. Few women had health insurance and most sought care from government health facilities. Although 45% reported depressive symptoms, less than one in five ever received counselling. In addition to diabetes, all but two reported ever being diagnosed with hypertension, almost half reported arthritis, one-third reported obesity, one-quarter reported depression and one-fifth reported anxiety. No women reported ever being diagnosed with HIV or tuberculosis, despite nearly 30% HIV prevalence among women, and half of tuberculosis cases afflicting those with HIV/AIDS, in poor Johannesburg neighbourhoods like Soweto (Karim et al., 2009). Although lack of reporting HIV positive status may be a reflection of stigma and fear around HIV disclosure, all women were HIV-affected, with one or more family members living with the virus.
|Total (n = 27)|
|Age (mean, ± SD)||59 ± 9.3 years|
|Duration of diabetes (mean ± SD)||10 ± 6.0 years|
|Education (n, %)|
|Less than matric (12 years)||17 (63%)|
|Completed matric and/or more||10 (37%)|
|Income (n, %)|
|Pension or less (R1,260)||13 (48%)|
|More than pension||14 (52%)|
|Health insurance (n, %)|
|Health insurance||9 (33%)|
|Health center (n, %)|
|Private provider||6 (22%)|
|Counselling for depression (n, %)|
|Never received counselling||22 (81.5%)|
|Ever received counselling||5 (18.5%)|
|Depression (n, %)|
|None (CESD < 16)||15 (55.5%)|
|Likely (CESD 16)||12 (44.5%)|
|Total (n = 27) (n, %)||Percent depressed (n, %)|
|Street violence||20 (74)||11 (55)|
|Relative shot||5 (19)||2 (40%)|
|Interpersonal violence||16 (59||9 (56)|
|Sexual abuse||4 (15)||3 (75)|
|Physical abuse||13 (48)||8 (62)|
|Emotional abuse||9 (33)||6 (67)|
|Verbal abuse||6 (22)||3 (50)|
|Alcoholic husband||9 (33)||4 (44)|
|Children stress||16 (59)||6 (38)|
|Loss of family member||15 (56)||4 (27)|
|Financial stress||13 (48)||7 (54)|
|Food insecurity||4 (15)||3 (75)|
|Diabetes stress||8 (30)||6 (75)|
|Depression (CESD 16)||12 (45)|
Semantics of stress in the mind and body
Most women believed stress will make you sick and defined stress in various ways, from ‘thinking too much’ to a physical pain manifest within the body, often in the shoulders or at the base of the neck:
Others associated stressors with acute physical responses, such as making your blood pressure spike.
Many identified a lifetime of social problems as causal to sickness, such as stress from an abusive spouse contributing to diabetes, hypertension and other ailments.
Specifically, one-third of the sample believed stress caused diabetes.
These women connected deep emotional pain with physical manifestations of stress – from the neck to the shoulders to biomedical categories of disease, including diabetes.
Social origins of stress
The most common social origins of women’s stress were street violence, interpersonal abuses, concerns about children and grandchildren, family deaths, financial stress and diabetes stress. Women averaged nearly five stressors (4.8 SD ± 2.1) in their narrative interviews and 45% presented depressive symptoms.
Three-quarters reported an incidence of public violence to be stressful, with more than half of these women reporting depressive symptoms. This violence encompassed many forms, from burglary to gun violence. Some women reported that their husbands were shot during the apartheid struggle. Almost every woman reported being victim to violence associated with tsotsis (gangsters), and many of these experiences were extreme, such as one woman who reported she finally had to put iron bars on her home after tsotsis forced their way in once to steal a television and another time to rape her children.
Domestic violence was reported by 16 women, and in many cases included repeated experiences throughout one’s life. One woman said, ‘I have basically been abused throughout all my life’. Four women reported sexual abuse, almost exclusively in childhood, and three of these women reported severe depressive symptoms:
Spousal abuse was common and two-thirds of these women reported depressive symptoms. In most cases, spousal battering was associated with an alcoholic husband, which was reported by one-third of the sample.
In most cases, physical abuse was compounded by emotional or verbal abuse; one-third of the sample reported emotional abuse, and one-fifth reported verbal abuse:
Nearly two-thirds described children and grandchildren as common sources of stress, and among these women nearly half reported depressive symptoms. Many women were primary caretakers for their grandchildren because their children died previously of AIDS, were in school, or working full time. Some women lived with their children and therefore took care of their grandchildren during the day; others worked to support their grandchildren in their children’s absence.
come and go as she pleased and I wasn’t feeling too well myself as a diabetic.”
Other women were concerned with their children’s social mobility because they were unemployed or had not finished high school. Behavioural problems of children and grandchildren were common concerns, including youth substance abuse. One woman said, ‘My nephew bullies and abuses everyone in the household, especially when he is drunk’. In most cases, these complaints had to do with young people spending time outside the home, where ‘they fight and rape people in the streets at night’.
More than half grieved the loss of a family member, mostly due to AIDS. In many cases women described losing their children and therefore raising grandchildren.
I: And where are their parents?
P: Their parents have passed away.
I: How did they pass away?
P: They fell sick with AIDS. (60-year-old woman)
However, women described the loss of children and spouses to myriad illnesses:
Gun violence was also a common source of family death:
Half described financial stress to cause chronic worry and half of these women reported depressive symptoms. Women linked financial stress both with their own jobs and worries and their children’s work and economic futures. More than half relied on pensions of R1200 per month (about $136) to, in many cases, support their families and in others pensions were supplemental income.
One-quarter of the women in the lower education group reported inability to buy foods that were necessary for their diabetes, including fruits and vegetables. One woman said, ‘I eat one fruit per day, and I should eat four, but I can only afford one’. Most women were aware of the foods they should eat, but their diabetes care was limited by, what we call, ‘diabetes food insecurity’.
Although many women described their diabetes diagnosis and adjusting to their diabetes self-care regimen as stressful, few found diabetes stressful in their daily life.
Some women described stress associated with diabetes complications:
or dealing with diabetes management:
Polysemous suffering in contexts of health transition
Due to the plurality of suffering in Soweto, where HIV and opportunistic infections such as tuberculosis are common, we found it difficult to ignore how other illnesses affect women’s everyday lives. We explicitly inquired about perceived overlaps among diabetes, HIV, tuberculosis and obesity. Although most understood a link between obesity and diabetes, or HIV and tuberculosis, the starkest results were between the relationship of HIV and diabetes, such as ‘some people say that diabetes and HIV is just the same thing’. Others stated that HIV and diabetes revealed similar identifying
Others described resemblances among the diseases because they both required treatment compliance for the rest of their lives.
I think that HIV/AIDS is a better predicament compared to diabetes. To start with, HIV/ AIDS is easily manageable relative to diabetes. Sugar diabetes requires more attention and there are certain foods that you have to forego as a diabetic unlike the HIV/AIDS patients who just need to stick to their treatment and can still eat anything; better yet they can still recover and be like any other normal person. But, regardless of how faithful you are to treatment and diet as a diabetic, it still attacks you when you least expect it”.
Many gave value judgements to the two diseases:
Others saw them as distinct, and these were often people who had close relationships with people who suffered and died from AIDS. In these cases, people used a prototype of someone with HIV or diabetes to make comparisons.
How people spoke about AIDS and other chronic diseases suggest that NCDs have become commonplace and are in some cases used to combat AIDS stigma. A 54-year-old woman stated: ‘A lot of people believe that HIV positive people prefer to say that that they are only suffering from diabetes’. Others suggested that people use other chronic illnesses, including diabetes, to convey their need for regular medical treatment to alleviate HIV/AIDS stigma. Some indicated that pastors would try to stamp out AIDS stigma in church by analogising HIV/AIDS to diabetes and cancer.
This article describes how women in Soweto conceive syndemic social and health problems as mutually exacerbating, co-constructions of suffering in everyday life. When women communicated the factors in their lives that caused stress, they often prioritised social problems as opposed to medical ones. This was exemplified in the hyper vigilance women faced while walking alone at night and the stress of putting one’s family needs before her own, despite new challenges associated with chronic illness. Indeed, many women showed how reconstructing families and raising grandchildren after losing children to AIDS was not only socially challenging but also affected how they ate, accepted and managed their diabetes. These data illuminate how social and medical complexities come together to shape syndemic suffering in Soweto and underscore how the semantics of suffering are transformed as notions of illness, disease and treatment adapt to emergent realities. We present four major conclusions that reveal how women experience and understand syndemic suffering in Soweto.
First, women conceived of physical suffering as deeply embedded into social and emotional trajectories across the life course, stating that stress was manifest in the body – from pain in the neck and shoulders – and communicated as ‘thinking too much’. This axiom of suffering and embodiment has emerged cross-culturally to demonstrate what anthropologist Kristin Yarris (2011) describes, with regard to Nicaraguan grandmothers, as ‘a near-constant worrying about the effects of social disruption – particularly the death, migration, and loss of family members – on their lives’ (p. 228). Grandmothers in Soweto similarly connected thinking too much with social disruption, such as interpersonal violence, loss of family members to HIV/AIDS and financial insecurities linked with the need to procure safe and healthy foods for diabetes. Many also perceived thinking too much to have a direct impact on biologies, such as glucose spikes, and stress as a diabetes aetiology, corresponding with a broader anthropological literature around the lived connections and aetiologies of stress and diabetes (cf. Schoenberg, Drew, Stroller, & Kart, 2005). Others characterised physical suffering as a result of the ‘many problems’ they have faced throughout their lives – not identifying specific incidences but emphasising the ordinariness of multiple factors shaping their current health conditions.
Second, women’s perceptions of overlap among HIV/AIDS and other chronic diseases exemplify how syndemic suffering can shape biomedical categories of disease into a polysemous entity that makes their emergence, synergy and persistence converge. These are not ‘cultural syndromes’ (Good, 1977) or traditional ‘idioms of distress’ (Nichter, 1981). Instead, the nuanced ways in which women describe multilayered forms of syndemic suffering within communities of high disease burden illustrate how women use and reframe biomedical disease nomenclature (Nichter, 2010) to communicate suffering in
everyday life. In this sense, the plurality of suffering comes together to incorporate social and biological maladies that take root via social, economic, psychological and physical pathways. Thus, the illness itself does not take centre stage because the ordinariness of suffering becomes part and parcel in everyday life. This has direct relevance for clinical practice and epidemiological research in public health because the ways in which people transmute biomedical categories into everyday forms of suffering may underlie how they identify or ‘name’ suffering in relation to or apart from biomedical frames. Moreover, it challenges the current biomedical model that separates treatment for infectious and noncommunicable diseases (e.g., separate clinics for patients with diabetes and those with HIV/AIDS) and underscores the importance of primary care integration.
Third, how people perceived and understood diabetes provided some insight into the experience of diabetes-related suffering in Soweto. Our data demonstrate relatively low levels of knowledge about what is diabetes, its causes and how one treats the disease. This is surprising as one in seven women in Soweto are insulin resistant (Crowther & Norris, 2012), although those who reported a diabetes diagnosis in the cohort is half that number (Mendenhall et al., 2013), indicating that many with diabetes may remain undiagnosed. Socioeconomic status and access to health care may play a role in people’s knowledge of their diabetes status or about diabetes more generally. Indeed, one-third of the women interviewed were largely unfamiliar with diabetes causes or treatment modalities, despite having sought regular treatment. This may be a result of the fact that women perceived diabetes as any other physical malady for which they sought treatment, and specifically how they juxtaposed its severity to HIV/AIDS, such as ‘the same’ or ‘worse’.
Finally, the persistence of social and psychological suffering was common and overlapping with chronic illness(es). On the one hand, the chronicities of violence and poverty likely explain why women displayed elevated symptoms of depression, a finding that underscores the Global Burden of Disease data identifying interpersonal violence as a leading disability in southern Africa (Murray et al., 2012). However, our recent article on psychological morbidity in the larger Bt20 cohort pushes this interpretation further. We found congruent prevalence of psychological morbidity (45%) among women without and with one chronic illness, although somatic symptoms and anxiety were more common than depression1 (Mendenhall et al., 2013). The data from the present study
suggest that indeed structural violence and persistent social problems may underlie such high psychological morbidity. And, indeed, it is the syndemic convergence of social, psychological and physical suffering that compromises women’s health. Therefore, we argue that it is not enough to investigate ‘diabetes’, ‘depression’ or even ‘HIV/AIDS’ in such contexts without attending to how the synergies among these coexisting maladies come together to shape women’s social, psychological and physical realities.
This study is not without limitations. We interviewed a convenience sample of women with diabetes participating in a cohort study who self-reported diabetes, so these findings may not reflect the experience of people seeking care at primary health care settings. As with all research of subjective experiences, there is also a possibility of recall bias. Moreover, this is a cross-sectional mixed qualitative and survey study, so we are unable to assign causality between stressors and depression (although, we do not claim to do so). We are also unable to say if the social experiences described by our sample resemble those of people with diabetes only, all Africans residing in Soweto or other social and economic groups in South Africa. Nevertheless, our study reveals important insight into how people perceive overlap among multiple, emergent diseases in geographies of health transition.
In conclusion, understanding how women like Flory conceptualise sickness and experience syndemic suffering provides insight into how communicable and noncommunicable diseases converge and become realised in people’s lives. This is particularly important in contexts like Soweto where emergent diseases take hold not only materially through people’s bodies but also cognitively in how people perceive and interpret their condition. As multiple physical morbidities become commonplace, particularly among the poor, more recognition of the role of social and psychological factors that contribute to and exacerbate such maladies requires attention. Indeed, the syndemic clustering of depression, diabetes and other problems cannot be dissociated from a social context where HIV is ordinary, and diabetes new.
We are extremely grateful to the women who took part in this study. Our study would have been impossible without the commitment of Mama Hunadi Shawa who scheduled interviews and conducted interviews in Zulu and Sesotho, and of Meikie Hlalele who assisted with two Zulu interviews. In addition, we are thankful for Sara Lewis’s and three anonymous reviewers’ insightful comments on the paper.
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and or publication of this article. This research was made possible by funding from the MRC/DFID African Research Leader Scheme (UK).
1. In this study we used the General Health Questionnaire-28 to evaluate psychological morbidity, which included somatic symptoms, anxiety, depression and social dysfunction. The 45% reporting across the sample (n = 1,743) does not reflect depression prevalence in the sample; while depressive symptoms were common, they were less frequent when compared to somatic and anxiety symptoms.
Coovadia, H., Jewkes, R., Barron, P., Sanders, D., & McIntyre, D. (2009). The health and health system of South Africa: Historical roots of current public health challenges. Lancet, 374, 817–834. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60951-X
Crowther, N. J., & Norris, S. A. (2012). The current waist circumference cut point used for the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome in sub-Saharan African women is not appropriate. PLoS One, 7, e48883. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048883
Daftary, A. (2012). HIV and tuberculosis: The construction and management of double stigma. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 1512–1519. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.027
Ellison, G. T. H., de Wet, T., Ijselmuiden, C. B., & Richter, L. (1997). Segregated health statistics perpetuate racial stereotypes. British Medical Journal, 314, 1485. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7092.1485
Garro, L. C. (2000). Remembering what one knows and the construction of the past: A comparison of cultural knowledge of cultural consensus theory and cultural schema theory. Ethos, 28, 275–319. doi:10.1525/eth.2000.28.3.275
Good, B. (1977). The heart of what’s the matter: The semantics of illness in Iran. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 1, 25–58. doi:10.1007/BF00114809
Holt, R. I. G., de Groot, M., & Golden, S. H. (2014). Diabetes and depression. Current Diabetes Reports, 14, 491. doi:10.1007/s11892-014-0491-3
Karim, S. S. A., Churchyard, G. J., Karim, A. A., & Lawn, S. D. (2009). HIV infection and tuberculosis in South Africa: An urgent need to escalate the public health response. Lancet, 374, 921–933. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60916-8
Kleinman, A. (1980). Patients and healers in the context of culture: An exploration of the borderland between anthropology, medicine and psychiatry. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Leone, T., Coast, E., Narayanan, S., & de Graft Aikins, A. (2012). Diabetes and depression comorbidity and socioeconomic status in low and middle income countries (LMICs): A mapping of the evidence. Globalization and Health, 8, 39. doi:10.1186/1744-8603-8-39
Lund, C., Breen, A., Flisher, A. J., Kakuma, R., Corrigall, J., Joska, J. A., … Patel, V. (2010). Poverty and common mental disorders in low and middle income countries: A systematic review. Social Science and Medicine, 71, 517–528. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.027
Mattingly, C., & Garro, L. C. (2000). Narrative and the cultural construction of illness and healing. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Mayosi, B. M., Flisher, A. J., Lalloo, U. G., Sitas, F., Tollman, S. M., & Bradshaw, D. (2009). The burden of non-communicable diseases in South Africa. Lancet, 374, 934–947. doi:10.1016/ S0140-6736(09)61087-4
Mayosi, B. M., Lawn, J. E., Niekerk, A., Bradshaw, D., Karim, S. S., Abdool, C., … Lancet South Africa Team. (2012). Health in South Africa: Changes and challenges since 2009. Lancet, 380, 2029–2043. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61814-5
Mendenhall, E. (2012). Syndemic suffering: Social distress, depression, and diabetes among Mexican immigrant women. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Mendenhall, E., Norris, S. A., Shidhaye, R., & Prabhakaran, D. (2014). Depression and Type 2 diabetes in low and middle income countries: A systematic review. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 103, 276–285.
Mendenhall, E., Richter, L.M., Stein, A.,&Norris, S. A. (2013). Psychological and physical co-morbidity among urban South African women. PLoS One, 8, e78803. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078803
Mendenhall, E., Seligman, R., Fernandez, A., & Jacobs, E. A. (2010). Speaking through diabetes: Rethinking the significance of lay discourses on diabetes. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 24, 220–239. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1387.2010.01098.x
Murray, C., Vos, T., Lozano, R., Naghavi, M., Flaxman, A. D., Michaud, C., … Lopez, A. D. (2012). Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet, 380, 2197–2223. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4
Nichter, M. (1981). Idioms of distress: Alternatives in the expression of psychosocial distress: A case study from South India. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 5, 379–408. doi:10.1007/BF00054782
Nichter, M. (2010). Idioms of distress revisited. Culture Medicine & Psychiatry, 34, 401–416. doi:10.1007/s11013-010-9179-6
Phaswana-Mafuya, N., Peltzer, K., Chirinda, W., Musekiwa, A., Kose, Z., Hoosain, E., … Ramlagan, S. (2013). Self-reported prevalence of chronic non-communicable diseases and associated factors among older adults in South Africa. Global Health Action, 6, 20936. doi:10.3402/gha.v6i0.20936
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401. doi:10.1177/ 014662167700100306
Richter, L. M., Norris, S. A., Pettifor, J., Yach, D., & Cameron, N. (2007). Cohort profile: Mandela’s children: The 1990 birth to twenty study in South Africa. International Journal of Epidemiology, 36, 504–511. doi:10.1093/ije/dym016
Schoenberg, N. E., Drew, E. M., Stroller, E. P., & Kart, C. S. (2005). Situating stress: Lessons from lay discourses on diabetes. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 19, 171–193. doi:10.1525/ maq.2005.19.2.171
Schwartz, T., Magdi, G., Steen, T. W., & Sjaastad, I. (2012). HIV as a risk factor for cardiac disease in Botswana: A cross-sectional study. International Health, 4(1), 30–37. doi:10.1016/j.inhe.2011.12.003
Singer, M. (2009). Introduction to Syndemics: A critical systems approach to public and community health. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Stewart, S., Carrington, M., Pretorius, S., Methusi, P., & Silwa, K. (2011). Standing at the crossroads between new and historically prevalent heart disease: Effects of migration and socioeconomic factors in the Heart of Soweto cohort study. European Heart Journal, 32, 492–499. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq439
Yarris, K. (2011). The pain of ‘thinking too much’: Dolor de Cerebro and the embodiment of social hardship among Nicaraguan women. Ethos, 39, 226–248. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1352.2011.01186.x